Talking about something never gets the job done.  It’s what you do.   And what exactly do your Cincinnati Reds have to do to win their division again this season, and then actually do something once they get into the playoffs?

I have come up with five things I think have to happen if this team is going to be a division winner and a World Series contender.  I could have come up with ten things, but I work for Channel 5 so five seems to be a good number.  And these are in no particular order.  Everyone one of them I think ‘has’ to happen if this is going to be the kind of season we all think it can.

Number one, this team must cut down on the number of strike outs it had last season.  I have said time and again, I believe the worst out in baseball is the strike out.   It does nothing to advance the game in your favor.  Sabermatricians guffaw at that and point to the double play as being the worst out in baseball.   It was brought to my attention in an email this week from one of our recurring guests on Sunday Morning Sports Talk, Dave Laurila from fangraphs.com that:

“With runners on first and third & none out, a team will score at least one run 84.6 percent of the time.

With runners on first and third & one out, a team will score at least one run 64.5 percent of the time.

With two out and the bases empty, a team will score at least one run 7.1 percent of the time.

Thus, hitting into a double play with runners on the corners means you score the one run, but are highly unlikely to score again that inning. If you strike out — for the first out of the inning — you will still score the run two-thirds of the time. Importantly, you have a much higher probability of scoring multiple runs with one out than you do with two.”

Dave is a sabermatrician.  I value the human element of the game more than numbers.  Honestly, you’ve sat at Great American Ball Park.  It sucks the air out of the joint when one of the hometown nine stands there and watches strike three go whizzing by him in a clutch situation.   It empowers the pitcher and energizes the other team.   Here’s the stat:  Reds hitters, not including pitchers, whiffed 1,138 times last season. Counting pitchers, 1,250-times.   That was seventh worst in the league and other than the Pirates, the worst in the NL Central.  None of the seven made the playoffs.  I don’t think that’s a coincidence.

Number two:  the Reds must get at least 110 games out of Scott Rolen.  Last year they massaged him for just 65, just 269 plate appearances.  That won’t cut it this year.   They need his right handed bat to break up the lefties in the line up.  And where’s the better option for clean up hitter?

With the exception of last season, Rolen has played in at least 112-games every season since 2006.  He still retains power.  He brings a veteran’s eye to every at bat.  In 2010, in 537 plate appearances Rolen whiffed just 82 times.  He’ll put the bat on the ball and he’s just a year removed from a Gold Glove year.  Now, imagine if he can’t play at least 110-games this season.  Who is the answer?  Juan Francisco?  Well, he was hurt in the minors this past summer and missed a couple of chances at call up.  But the Reds couldn’t ship him down there fast enough in mid-April.  Todd Frazier can play third.  But do you think this team wins with anyone besides Rolen at third base for more than 60 games?

Number three:  the back end of the pitching rotation, starters four and five, must deliver 23 wins.   I’m guessing Bronson Arroyo and Homer Bailey will be starters four and five.  It depends on whether or not Aroldis Chapman is around by Opening Day.   Last year, the fourth and fifth starters, Edinson Volquez and Travis Wood combined for eleven wins.  Not good enough.  The fourth and fifth starters in St. Louis, Jake Westbrook and Edwin Jackson combined for 17.  But you also have to factor in Kyle McLellan who had 12 before getting bumped from the rotation.  That’s 29 wins from the back end of the rotation for a team that won 90 games.

Can Arroyo and Bailey combine for 23 wins?  If they’re both healthy, yes.  Arroyo won nine last year, battling a variety of maladies.  Bailey missed the start of the season and some time during and won nine.  They only have to kick that up five more wins between them.  Honestly, if healthy, I think both can combine for in excess of 25 wins.   But 23 is the magic number because…

Number four:  the top of the rotation has to deliver 43 wins.   Johnny Cueto, Mat Latos and most probably Mike Leake will be the top three.   43 wins is exactly the same number the top three Reds starters delivered in 2010, and that was with Aaron Harang in that third spot.  17-wins from Cueto, 14-from Latos and 12-from Leake.  Is that realistic?  Cueto won nine last year.  But he didn’t make his first start until May 8^th and pitched only 156 innings.  If he can go an additional 60 innings, not a crazy number for the ‘ace’ of a staff, he could just those nine wins up to 17.  He won 12 in 2010 and only pitched 185.  Leake won 12 last year.  He can win at least that this year, largely because they should be done baby-ing him and watching his innings.

And as for the ability for Latos to win 14, he did that two years ago.  And last year, the victim of some bad luck, Latos pitched over 194 innings.   43 wins from the top of the rotation isn’t asking a lot.   Pair that with the 23 from the back end, that’s 66 wins from the starters.  The Cardinals got 67 wins from their starting pitching last year.   Remember, they won 90, total.

In 2010, the Reds got 52 wins from the six pitchers who started most of their games.

Number five:  the Reds must find a way to replicate the left field production they got in 2010.   Remember, Johnny Gomes and Laynce Nix were a solid combination:  Nix hit .291, hit four home runs and drive in 18.  Gomes hits .266, drove in 86 and knocked 18 out of the park.  Last year, the combination of Gomes, Chris Heisey and Fred Lewis combined for 29 home runs and 100 rbi.  Those are solid power numbers from one position.   Heisey and Ryan Ludwick must find a way to keep the production coming, while hitting for average.   Heisey hit .250 last season.  Ludwick, just .237.

So there you have it, my five things that have to happen if the walk will be as good as the talk has been with this team.  If any of those five don’t happen, the Reds better hope for a monumental collapse by the Cardinals and Brewers.

Here’s Xavier’s problem:  despite having early season impressive wins overr Purdue and Vanderbilt, the Musketeers have gone 8-9 over the 17 games since the Crosstown Brawl.  Worse, none of those eight wins have come against the quality teams in the Atlantic 10 Conference.  The good news for Xavier is, it still has games left with first place contenders Dayton and St. Louis.  But unless Xavier can manage to beat those teams (the Flyers at the Cintas Center and the Billikens on the road), it will will almost have to win the post season conference tournament to get into the NCAA’s.

UC’s situation is slightly different than Xavier’s.  Lunardi has the Bearcats one of the last four teams ‘in’, in his lastest ‘bracketology.  It should also be noted that USA Today has UC ‘out’ and Xavier ‘in’.  But what separates UC from Xavier is that the Bearcats have wins over a couple of elite teams in the Big East Conference, against Georgetown and Connecticut, both on the road by the way.   Now, UC gets to play four of its final six games at home, with a real chance to feather its next if it can beat Louisville and Marquette, at this moment, both top 25 teams.  A win or two in the Big East Conference tournament could seal it for the Bearcats.

The important thing to remember is that there is time for both teams to pad their tournament resumes.  Of course, the other side of that argument is true as well.  Both teams have plenty of times to play their way out of March Madness.

Madonna should have left the dancing to her stage mates.  She looked like she was moving in slow motion.   Don’t get me wrong, for a 52 year old woman, she looked great, but terribly stuck in the ’80′s….

When she vanished at the end of her show and the World Peace sign lit up, did that mean Madonna had to die for world peace to happen?   Have we seen her since?….

Or was that simply a tribute to the artist formerly known as Ron Artest?…..

How much over the top would it have been (like it wasn’t as is) if during her final number, Madonna and her crew dropped to a “Tebowing” pose (the song was, after all, “Like A Prayer”) and then rising from the stage on a hydraulic lift was the real Tebow “Tebowing”?…..

And you thought the rest of the world really hates us right  now…

I think Bill Belichick was a great coach before Sunday’s Super Bowl loss to the Giants.  I think he’s even a better coach now.  Consider this, Belichick probably had his worst team, defensively, that’s appeared in a Super Bowl.  And while the Patriots didn’t beat a team with a winning record this season until the AFC Championship game when they beat the Ravens, Belichick managed to guide his team all the way to the final game of the season.  When you hear talk about coaching making a difference, the conversation should start with Belichick…

Belichick and Coughlin both come from Bill Parcell’s coaching tree.  But every coaching twig began with Paul Brown.  I have no doubt if he were alive and coaching today, he would be the exact same genius he was back in the 40′s and 50′s.   I still can’t believe he’s been gone 20 years….

Eli or Peyton?  Stop the nonsense.  Peyton Manning was the definitive quarterback of the last 12 years.  Eli has more Super Bowl wins and MVP awards than his big brother and may eventually be seen in the same league as Peyton, but he’s not there yet…..

Best Super Bowl commercial, hands down, was the “Halftime In America” spot for Chrysler.  Truth be told, 20 seconds into the commercial, I thought Clint Eastwood was going to announce he’s running for President.   I don’t get how anyone saw any political implications in the commercial.   I thought Dirty Harry was just trying to sell American made cars.  Did anyone think Emminen was making a political speech last year when he did the Super Bowl commercial for Chrysler?…

Eastwood claims he has no political affiliation, says he’s a Libertarian now.  When he was Mayor of Carmel, California, he was an independent….

Eastwood was paid $1 million to do the commercial.  He said Monday night he donated all of that to a charity of his choice.   The only thing I found wrong with the commercial was that it was filmed in New Orleans, not Detroit.

Anyhow, I don’t need a car.  But around 8:30pm ET last Sunday night, I wanted to run out and buy a Chrysler.  Good spot…

Here’s my latest Morning Broo Podcast.  http://tiny.cc/cpkgr  I’m wondering today if the Reds did everything they could have this off-season to insure they’ll contend.  My guest in this edition is Scott Miller from cbssports.com

If you’d like to subscribe to my Morning Broo Podcast, you can do so in the Itunes store.